Selection is generally based on patronage, in the grand scheme of things, be it business, politics or sport. Cricket, it seems, is no different. I feel very sorry for Foulkes, who has always stepped up to the plate for England. His rejection by English selectors is a blight on their so-called revival. But the old mates club have put what they would deem as cronyism in front of real talent. The consequence of course, as Michael explains, is the Ashes remain in Australia.
Selection is generally based on patronage, in the grand scheme of things, be it business, politics or sport. Cricket, it seems, is no different. I feel very sorry for Foulkes, who has always stepped up to the plate for England. His rejection by English selectors is a blight on their so-called revival. But the old mates club have put what they would deem as cronyism in front of real talent. The consequence of course, as Michael explains, is the Ashes remain in Australia.
Excellent analysis. Well said.
Right on the money, Hendo. The continued selection of Jimmy Anderson, who has looked every one of his 40 years this summer, also bears scrutiny...